In embedded systems design, selecting the right microcontroller is crucial. Two widely discussed series—STMicroelectronics' STM32 and GigaDevice's GD32—often present engineers with choices that require thorough understanding of their differences and compatibility. ANDESOURCE provides a comprehensive comparison of STM32 versus GD32 microcontrollers to guide designers and engineers toward informed decisions.
Overview
The STM32 microcontrollers by STMicroelectronics have established themselves as a leading series based on ARM Cortex-M cores, recognized for their extensive ecosystem and industry-wide adoption.
Conversely, GigaDevice’s GD32 series has emerged as a popular alternative due to its cost-effectiveness, higher clock speeds, and compatibility with STM32, particularly regarding hardware pin layouts.
GD32 uses a unique two-die architecture (an ARM Cortex-M3 core with an external flash die in the same package). This design enables zero-wait-state flash execution and larger flash capacity (up to 3 MB), but also contributes to higher standby current and a brief ~2 ms startup delay.
STM32 VS GD32 Comparison Table
Category | STM32 | GD32 |
Core Architecture | Cortex-M3 R1P1 (F103), R2P1 (F205) | Cortex-M3 R2P1 (fixes bugs in R1P1) |
Max Clock Frequency | Typically 72 MHz | Typically 108 MHz |
Flash Execution Speed | Requires wait-states at high speed | Zero wait-state execution |
Voltage Range | 2.0V–3.6V | 2.6V–3.6V |
Core Voltage | 1.8V | 1.2V |
Pin Compatibility | Yes | Yes |
BOOT0 Pin Behavior | Can float in Flash mode | Must be externally pulled down in Flash mode |
Peripheral Register Addressing | Logical addresses match | Same, reverse-engineered for compatibility |
ESD Protection | 2kV HBM / 500V CDM | 3kV HBM (official), 500V CDM; anecdotal tests suggest up to 5kV HBM and 15kV air discharge |
Startup Time | Standard | Requires 2ms delay |
FLASH Erase Time | 30 ms/page (typical) | 60 ms/page (typical, may vary) |
Max FLASH Capacity | Varies | Up to 3 MB |
SRAM Capacity | Up to 96 KB (in higher-end F1 variants) | Up to 96 KB in GD32F103/105/107 |
FSMC Bus Support | 144-pin and ≥256KB required | 100-pin supported |
USART Transmission | Continuous | Idle bit inserted between bytes |
ADC Impedance | High (minimal loading) | Lower (buffering may be needed) |
Timer/DMA Behavior | Stable | Slight variances—requires testing |
Peripheral Clock Config | Flexible | Clock must be enabled before peripheral configuration |
SWD Signal Strength | Strong | Weaker—may need layout consideration |
Sleep Mode Current | 7.5 mA | 12.4 mA |
Deep Sleep Current | 24 μA | 1.4 mA |
Standby Current | 3.4 μA | 10.5 μA |
Run Mode Current (72MHz) | 52 mA | 32.4 mA |
ISP Timing | Standard | Slightly different, requires newer ISP tools |
IAP Functionality | Page erase, word write | Same |
FLASH Endurance | 10k cycles (min), 20+ years | Up to 100k cycles (vendor-stated), 20+ years |
Encryption/Security | Readout protection + 96-bit ID | Same, plus: physical address non-contiguity for write (anecdotal) |
Toolchain | Keil MDK, IAR, etc. | Fully compatible |
Function Libraries | Same, requires header file tweaking | Same |
Naming Convention | Same | Same |
Cost & Availability | Higher cost, possible shortages | Lower cost, better availability |
Ecosystem Support | Mature, strong community & vendor support | Compatible but may need slight porting |
Application Considerations: Choosing Between STM32 and GD32
When deciding between STM32 and GD32 microcontrollers for a specific embedded application, engineers must evaluate not just pin and software compatibility but also performance characteristics, peripheral behavior, ecosystem maturity, and power efficiency. The choice should be guided by the specific needs of the application in areas such as real-time performance, power management, design complexity, cost constraints, and regulatory robustness.
1. Performance-Critical Applications
GD32 microcontrollers offer a notable performance advantage with a higher maximum clock speed (108 MHz vs. 72 MHz) and zero wait-state FLASH execution, making them better suited for high-speed, compute-intensive tasks, such as:
l Digital signal processing
l Real-time control systems
l High-frame-rate motor control
l Fast ADC/DAC sampling tasks
Choose GD32 when high processing throughput is critical and even microsecond-level delays can impact system responsiveness.
2. Low-Power and Battery-Operated Designs
STM32 significantly outperforms GD32 in ultra-low-power modes, particularly:
l Deep sleep (24 μA vs. 1.4 mA)
l Standby (3.4 μA vs. 10.5 μA)
These differences are substantial in long-duration sleep scenarios, such as:
l IoT sensors with long sleep/wake cycles
l Wearable devices
l Remote telemetry units
Choose STM32 for ultra-low-power applications where energy consumption in sleep/standby modes is mission-critical.
3. Cost-Sensitive or High-Volume Products
GD32 has a clear advantage in cost and availability, often priced lower and more easily sourced than STM32, which can face global supply constraints.
For consumer electronics, educational tools, or budget-constrained systems where every cent matters:
l GD32 allows mass deployment with performance headroom
l Offers better cost-to-performance ratio
Choose GD32 in high-volume or price-sensitive markets.
4. Safety, EMI, and Harsh Environments
GD32 provides stronger ESD protection:
l 3 kV HBM vs. 2 kV (STM32)
l Informal tests suggest up to 15 kV air discharge immunity, but this is anecdotal
This makes GD32 more resilient in electrically noisy or industrial environments, including:
l Power meters
l Industrial controllers
l Consumer appliances with poor grounding
Choose GD32 where ESD immunity and robust protection are design priorities.
5. Software Portability and Ecosystem Maturity
STM32 benefits from:
l Extensive development ecosystem (STM32CubeMX, HAL, LL drivers)
l Strong community and vendor support
l Wide third-party tool compatibility
GD32 is largely software-compatible, but engineers might need:
l Slight adaptations for Flash behavior, BOOT configuration, or clock setup
l Adjustments for toolchain quirks (e.g., ISP software differences)
Choose STM32 when fast development, community support, and documentation are essential for time-to-market.
6. Security and Flash Management
Both STM32 and GD32 microcontrollers support readout protection (RDP) via option bytes, which can prevent unauthorized access to firmware through the debug interface. This is the primary mechanism for embedded firmware security on both platforms.
While GD32 uses a two-die design with separate on-package flash memory, this architecture does not offer any officially documented or functional advantage in terms of security. The physical separation of code and core may incidentally complicate certain reverse engineering techniques, but it is not intended or recognized as a security feature.
Choose either STM32 or GD32 for secure firmware deployment by correctly enabling RDP. Relying on memory layout or obscurity alone is not a substitute for proper protection.
ANDESOURCE – Your Reliable Electronic Component Sourcing Partner
At ANDESOURCE, we simplify the process of sourcing electronic components by offering tailored solutions—not one-size-fits-all approaches. We work closely with you to find components that precisely meet your specifications. Thanks to our strong partnerships with reputable manufacturers, we provide top-quality components at competitive prices. Each component undergoes strict quality testing, and our prompt delivery keeps your projects running smoothly.
Partner with ANDESOURCE for efficient, customized sourcing you can count on. Reach out today to get started!
